“We have long past taken care to discredit the clergy of the Goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hinderance to us. Day by day their influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. Freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment of the COMPLETE WRECKING of that Christian religion! As to other religions, we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them.
“In the meantime, we shall not overtly lay a finger on existing churches, but we shall fight against them by criticism. Our contemporary press will continue be every means to lower their prestige in the manner which can only be practised by the genius of our gifted tribe.” – Protocol 17
The Jews, have become the most ANTI-God people on the face of the earth because they rejected God and rejected His Son! They’ve gone the opposite way, to where they now fight Jesus more than any other people. More than any other religion, Jews and Judaism actively FIGHT Christ. They’re not just neutral, they’re not indifferent, they are actively ANTI-CHRIST! Most of the hate and evil that can be found in Judiasm, is not from the Bible, it’s from the TALMUD, the writings of their rabbis and elders supposedly about the Bible; the traditions of men of which Jesus told them, “You have made the Word of God of none effect through your traditions!” (Mark 7:13) The Jew’s view of their Talmudic teachings is expressed in “The Jewish Encyclopedia”:
“The Talmud is regarded almost as the supreme authority by the majority of Jews. Even the Bible is relegated to a secondary place.”
The Talmud itself says:
“The words of the elders are more important than the words of the Prophets.” (Treatise Berachoth, i.4.)
Regarding Jesus Christ, “The Jewish Encyclopedia” tells us:
“It is the tendency of Jewish legends in the Talmud, the Midrash” (the sermons in the synagogues) “and in the Life of Jesus Christ (Toledoth Jeshua) that originated in the Middle Ages, to belittle the person of Jesus by ascribing to Him illegitimate birth, magic, and a shameful death. He is generally alluded to as ‘that anonymous one’, ‘liar’, ‘impostor’, or ‘bastard’.”
These “sacred” writings of the Jews also refer to Jesus as a “fool”, “sorcerer”, “profane person”, “idolater”, “dog”, “child of lust”, and much worse. The Jews’ wish to conceal from the outer world that which they teach led to the censoring of the above- referred-to passages of the Talmud during the 17th century. Knowledge of the Talmud had become fairly widespread then and the embarrassment thus caused to the rabbis and elders led to the following edict (translated from the original Hebrew by P.L.B. Drach, who was brought up in a Talmudic school and later became converted to Christianity): top of page
“This is why we enjoin you, under pain of excommunication major, to print nothing in future editions, whether of the Mishna or of the Gemara, which relates whether for good or evil to the acts of Jesus the Nazarene, and to substitute instead a circle like this: ‘O’, which will warn the rabbis and schoolmasters to teach the young these passages only ‘viva voce’ (by word of mouth). By means of this precaution the followers of the Nazarene will have no further pretext to attack us on this subject.” (Decree of the Judaist Synod which met in Poland in 1631.)
Although the Jews today are as anti-Christ as they’ve ever been, they’ve been so clever in their propaganda, they have even sold the Christians on the idea that they are God’s special “chosen people”! The preferred Bible that most fundamental American Christians use today is the “Scofield” version, which is just full a false doctrines and interpretations trying to prove that the Jews are God’s people. It’s shocking to realise that actual Christians are now so deceived by the Jews that they’ve allowed them to kick the Bible and God and prayer out of the publik schools! They don’t even see what is going on!
Just think! – Millions of Christians are now supporting the people of the Antichrist! In fact, some of them are the staunchest friends of “ISRAEL”! The cruel, anti-Christ leaders of “Israel” who have STOLEN an entire country from its rightful owners, are now saying that the Fundamentalist CHRISTIANS of America are their greatest friends and staunchest supporters! A 1985 “Washington Post” article cites a good example showing how duped and deceived many of these Christians are:
“Rev. Falwell (popular American preacher and leader of the so-called “Moral Majority”) told the conservative Rabbinical Assembly at their March 13 Miami session, ‘Twenty-five years ago many of us were saying this is a Christian republic.’ He added, ‘NOW we say “JUDEO-Christian” republic. There is a spirit of pluralism that did not exist then. We have had our excesses’, Mr. Falwell said, ‘and we can only say we’re sorry and we’ll try and ‘do better’. He promised to ‘mobilise 70 million conservative Christians for Israel and against “anti-Semitism”. Rabbi Marc Tanenbaum of the American Jewish Committee commented after the Miami session, in which he participated, ‘It was thrilling to watch Jerry Falwell become a born-again American.'” top of page
Another “Washington Post” article said,
“Embracing Abraham’s Covenant as fervently as the most impassioned Zionists, the burgeoning Evangelical Christian movement in the United States is fast becoming one of Israel’s most potent allies in its conflict with the Arab world. An aide to Mr. Menachem Begin said that the Evangelicals “are a pillar that Israel has in the United States. They number ten times the Jews in America, and they are outspoken. Naturally, we look KINDLY on what they are doing.”
Imagine, Menachem BEGIN and his ilk “looking kindly” on the CHRISTIANS of America! Begin, Yitzak Shamir, Ariel Sharon and the other Jewish TERRORISTS who now rule “Israel” are as ruthless and anti-Christ as anyone could possibly be! Begin is the former leader of the terrorist organisation, IRGUN, and he personally claimed responsibility for blowing up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing over ninety innocent civilians. It was Begin, who in April 1948, ordered and led the Irgun attack on the unarmed Arab village of Deir Yasin in Palestine, murdering 254 helpless men, women, and children! The incident received scant news coverage in the West, although “Time” magazine did report:
“Jewish terrorists of the Stern Gang and Irgun Zvai Leumi stormed the village of Deir Yasin and butchered everyone in sight. The corpses of 250 Arabs, mostly women and small children, were later found tossed in wells.”
This atrocity so shocked and terrified the surrounding Arab communities, that as news of it spread, they immediately abandoned their homes, farms and villages, and fled into the desert, warned by the Israelis that the same fate would befall them. Today 40 YEARS LATER, literally MILLIONS of homeless Christian and Muslim Palestinians are suffering in squalor, poverty, and deprivation in “refugee camps” in the Arab nations bordering Israel. Boasting in Tel Aviv during an election campaign in 1950, Begin claimed credit for the foundation of the Zionist State through his great “military victory” at DEIR YASIN:
“Irgun’s contribution to Israel was DEIR YASIN, which caused the Arabs to leave the country and make room for the newcomers. Without Deir Yasin and the subsequent Arab rout, the present government could not absorb one-tenth of the immigrants.”
It’s hard to believe that CHRISTIANS could actually support and rally around someone like Menachem Begin! – How easily the Jews have been able to deceive them! They’ve been duped worse than anybody! Jesus told the Jewish leaders of His day that they were “whited sepulchres full of dead men’s bones! – Clean on the OUTSIDE of the platter, but WITHIN were full of FILTH and ROT and ALL uncleanliness!” (Mat 23:25-27) They are IMPOSTORS, Scribes, Pharisees, HYPOCRITES! Pretending to be so just and righteous, they’ve used their international political and economic clout to steal an entire COUNTRY away from the poor Palestinians who’d lived there for almost 2,000 years!
The whole thing is a LIE of the Devil! He’s DECEIVED ALMOST THE WHOLE WORLD into believing that they’re the “chosen people” returning to their “promised land”. But they are IMPOSTORS! Jewish source after Jewish source document this. Consider the JEWISH Historian Nathan M. Pollock who by 1966 had devoted 40 of his 64 years trying to prove at least 6 out of 10 ISRAELIS and 9 out of 10 Jews in the Western Hemisphere HAVE NO SEMITE BLOOD! He and a host of others have gathered an INCREDIBLE amount of documentation on this FACT! Consider this when you see the media or someone who is too ignorant to know better labeling someone for criticizing the Jews as “anti-Semite”. In FACT, the Jews are the most ANTI-SEMITIC PEOPLE the world has ever known. They are relentless in their persecution, torture, and murder of the Arabs, TRUE SEMITIC people who are the direct descendants of Abraham. top of page
Also consider what the Jewish historian/writer Arthur Koestler has to say on page 17 of his awesome and enlightening book, “The Thirteenth Tribe”:
“The large majority of Jews after World War II in the world, were of Eastern origin-and thus perhaps mainly of Khazar origin. If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan, but from the Volga; not from the Canaan but from the Caucausus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race. Genetically, they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Should this turn out to be the case, then the term anti-Semitic would be VOID OF MEANING, based on a MISAPPREHENSION shared by both killers and victims. The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel HOAX which history has ever perpetrated.” [Indeed, Mr. Koestler went on to provide intense proof of ALL of this and much more!]
God doesn’t need us to promote Israel. Anyone who believes that the ZIONIST STATE of Israel set up by this One World Conspiracy is the same as the NATION of ISRAEL referred to in Scriptures, IS MISERABLY DECEIVED the way Christ warned us in Scriptures that “MANY would be”. ANY Christian preacher who actively teaches this FALSE DOCTRINE is also either miserably deceived or he is outright LYING, and may God have mercy on him. The Seed of Abraham IS NOT THE SAME AS the so-called and self-styled “Jews” of today!! [See Rev 2:9; 3:9 – MANY other Scripture verses confirm this also.]
Jesus Himself told them, “Ye are of your father the DEVIL, and the lusts of your father ye will do! He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him!” (Jn 8:44) They have tried to ruthlessly cast out the TRUE children of God in Palestine, the Christian Palestinians, and to establish their own “Messianic Kingdom” in modern-day so-called “Israel”! What a travesty of justice and mockery of the Truth!
The Jews have now got most of the Christians so deceived and so blinded and so deafened by their propaganda, that they follow along, tag along, like they’re on a leash. “Gentile dogs” is exactly what the Jews call the “Goyim”, and they’re certainly on the leash now, trotting along right behind, assisting the anti-Semitic Jews promote the Godless STATE of Israel and her MURDERERS . . . going everywhere the Jews go, “barking and yapping” exactly what they want them to say and doing exactly as they want them to do!
The Christians of this world are going to wake up one of these days and find out what a big mistake they made in giving the Mideast to the Jews! – And in giving their OWN countries to the Jews! When the Jews finally get in FULL control and show their true colors, particularly under the ANTICHRIST, then some of these Christians are going to wake up to the FACT that they made a big mistake in backing the Jews who one day soon will openly show themselves to be the very forces of the Antichrist himself! – But by then, for many, it will be too late! top of page
Christian Left Veers on Israel After Jews Helped in a Crisis
National Council of Churches Sign Onto Campaign Against Jerusalem
WASHINGTON – An advertisement placed by liberal Protestant groups calling for an end to Israel’s sovereignty over Jerusalem is threatening to erode the interfaith cooperation that led to last summer’s fabled Jewish-Christian joint effort on the rebuilding of burnt black churches.
The general secretary of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, the Rev. Joan Brown Campbell, who signed the ad, appeared in June with Rabbi David Saperstein at a press conference in New York to announce that the Union of American Hebrew Congregations would assist in reconstructing the arson-damaged churches. Her organization, a leading voice for the Christian left, took out joint newspaper advertisements with the American Jewish Committee to draw attention to the church burnings, and in August she traveled with the AJCommittee’s Rabbi A. James Rudin and other religious leaders to rebuild a church in Tennessee with President Clinton.
Now those same rabbis are expressing disappointment at the Rev. Campbell, the National Council of Churches and the other Christian groups that placed a full-page advertisement in the Dec. 21 number of The New York Times. Under the title “Christians Call for a Shared Jerusalem,” the ad says, “Jerusalem at peace cannot belong exclusively to one people, one country, or one religion.” Jewish leaders say they were not consulted in advance of the ad. They warned that the statement might hurt the delicate Middle East peace process as well as relations between Christians and Jews in America.
“It is a major disappointment that erodes the level of confidence necessary to have really close, functioning, coalition relationships,” Rabbi Saperstein said.
He said the peace process now is at a precarious stage over issues like Hebron and Palestinian Arab autonomy. The parties to the process agreed to leave discussion of Jerusalem to the end of the talks, he said, and to inject the Holy City into the discussion now would be counterproductive. “Whatever one thinks of the merits of the message, the choice to put this message out right now is clearly ill-advised and likely to undermine the peace process,” Rabbi Saperstein said.
Rabbi Rudin also expressed dismay at the timing of the ad. “It’s aimed at the Netanyahu government, it’s aimed at an Israeli government,” he said. “It’s really a one-sided statement….It’s just very negative.” Rabbi Rudin said the ad’s signers were not calling for the internationalization of Jerusalem before 1967, when Israel captured the eastern part of the city from Jordan. He emphasized that the
AJCommittee had donated no money to the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, and he said that, while cooperating with liberal Protestant groups on domestic issues, AJCommittee often differs with those groups on international matters. Likewise, the organization may cooperate with evangelical Christian groups on some international matters but differ on domestic policy.
“It certainly does not represent the views of all Christians,” said the secretary-treasurer of the National Christian Leadership Conference, the Rev. William Harter. The Rev. Harter, pastor of the Presbyterian Church of Falling Spring in Chambersburg, Pa., called the views expressed in the ad “naive” and “ill-informed.”
The Rev. Harter said that in view of 1,900 years of Christian anti-Semitism and the effects of the Crusades against Jews, Muslims and Eastern Christians, “It is especially unbecoming for Christian leaders to be dictating to Jews and Muslims what solutions they should come up with.”
For his part, Rabbi Saperstein rejected the suggestion that UAHC donations to the council of churches’ restricted fund for rebuilding burnt churches had in any way subsidized the ad.
The ad includes a coupon to return to “Churches for Middle East Peace” and listed an address here for the organization in the same building occupied by the Washington offices of the National Council of the Churches, the American Baptist Churches, USA, Church of the Brethren, the Mennonite Central Committee, the Presbyterian Church (USA), the Unitarian Universalist Association, the United Church of Christ and the United Methodist Church. Those groups signed the ad, as did the American Friends Service Committee, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), the Episcopal Church, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Friends Committee on National Legislation, the Maryknoll Fathers and Brothers and the Catholic Conference of Major Superiors of Men’s Institutes. Another signer is James Akins, who is suing the Federal Election Commission with a group of former American officials to force the FEC to take action against the pro-Israel lobby, Aipac.
The coupon says, “I believe the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee should raise and recommend the concept of a shared Jerusalem during confirmation of the next U.S. Secretary of State.”
Rabbi Rudin described Churches for Middle East Peace as “uniformly unfriendly to Israel,” and he characterized the signers of the ad as “a heavily liberal Protestant group” that had little representation of the Catholic or evangelical Christians. “It does not represent the broad cross-section of all the Christian community,” he said.
The director of Churches for Middle East Peace, Corrine Whitlatch, said the ad was timed to coincide with Christmas, when people would be interested in a Christian perspective on Jerusalem. She said the ad was not intended to hurt the peace process or interfaith cooperation. “We hope that our Jewish colleagues can see this ad as a constructive step forward, one that does not threaten Israel’s interests and claims on Jerusalem,” she said.
Ms. Whitlatch said that the Rev. Campbell had been “personally very supportive” of the ad. She said that while many Jews might have preferred that her group remain silent on the issue of Jerusalem, such a posture was “just not feasible” because of pressure from Christians in the Middle East.
The Rev. Campbell did not return a phone call seeking comment.
Abraham Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, which also participated in the effort to rebuild burnt black churches, drafted a letter to all of the signers of the advertisement. “We are saddened that religious leaders who are charged with bringing spiritual understanding and healing to their communities and the world are now spreading confusion and division regarding this most sensitive issue,” wrote Mr. Foxman, who referred to the ad as an “unhelpful intrusion.”
The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations huddled early Monday to craft a response to the ad. Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice president of the Conference, called the ad “very disturbing,” noting that several member organizations have worked with groups that signed the ad.
The Conference plans no ad to respond to the one placed by Churches for Middle East Peace, but it does plan to develop talking points on the subject and to contact Senator Helms and the Rev. Campbell, said one president who participated in the call. The response will probably emphasize the ill treatment suffered by Christians when Jerusalem was under Arab control.
HOW THEY STOLE THE CHURCH
by Professor Revilo P. Oliver (August 1991), Liberty Bell Magazine top of page
Christianity is still one of the cardinal factors in any reasonable estimate of our present plight. It is certainly more important than economics, and it made possible the alien capture and occupation of the United States.
The Christian churches fall into two categories. The Protestant sects necessarily depend for their authority on a belief that the Bible was divinely inspired and is therefore literally accurate. This basis of their religion was gradually eroded over the past century. With few noteworthy exceptions, (1) the major Protestant churches have slyly but effectively replaced their Bible with the “social gospel” of the Marxian Reformation, relying on the fecklessness or gullibility of their congregations to overlook the spiritual swindle. They have thus become religiously, as well as intellectually, fraudulent.
(1. The principle exceptions are the Missouri Synod of the Lutherans, which is now in the hands of a bureaucracy that is bent on debasing it to the level of the “main-line” Lutheran churches (cf. *Liberty Bell*, July 1990, pp. 16-25); the much smaller Wisconsin Synod, which has troubles of its own; small groups of Presbyterians, headed by Dr. Rousas J. Rushdoony, and Anglicans, headed by the late Bishop Dees, who try to preserve the essentials of their religion; and the Mormons, who have supplemental Scriptures of their own, but have serious internal dissension (cf. *Liberty Bell*, July 1989, pp. 13-37) and are increasingly vulnerable to attacks on their new gospels (cf. *Liberty Bell(, December 1989, pp. 10-28.)
The Roman Catholic Church was less vulnerable because less dependent on the Bible, which, for many centuries, it forbade laymen to read. It claims to represent an apostolic succession from the incarnate god of Christianity, and until quite recently, it, by far the largest of Christian denominations, exhibited a monolithic solidarity that made it seem impregnable. (2) Then, only a few years ago, it was suddenly shattered by an internal revolution, as sudden and drastic as the Jews’ Bolshevik revolution in Russia, and far more suprising to observers of world affairs.
(2. In *America’s Decline*, pp. 78-79, I described the Church as it appeared in 1955 to observers who, having no religion, could consider the problem objectively and even had the benefit of information that had been available only through military intelligence, including secret communications between the Vatican and its branches in several parts of the world.)
It was a ‘palace revolution.’ What had been the Church’s great strength became its fatal weakness. When the conspirators captured the Vatican, they became the masters of all their subordinates in the regular Church and in the monastic orders, from archbishops to parish priests to yet unordained postulants and students in seminaries. By the power of excommunication they could deprive any dissident of his livelihood by preventing him from practicing the only art he knew. It required great faith and great courage even to question the dictates of the revolutionary r‚gime.
Archbishops, of course, were persons of some consequence, accustomed to luxury suited to their exalted position, and if any of them was sufficiently interested in the Church’s doctrine to resent the change, it is likely that he was kept in line by threats sweetened by generous bribes. Malcontents and soft-spoken dissidents within the Roman Curia were tolerated until they were eliminated or cowed by terrorism after the murder of John Paul I in 1989. (3) Conscientious priests, unless able to escape notice, had no alternative but to leave the Church and seek other means of earning a living. Many of them did, including two with whom I was aquainted. I have seen an estimate that throughout the world 100,000 priests left the apostate Church, but I hesitate to accept that figure.
(3. There can be no reasonable doubt that the Pope was murdered, although the motive for the crime remains obscure. I have referred more than once to David Yallin’s sensational book, *In God’s Name*, but I have only recently received a copy of a work by Piers Compton, *The Broken Cross* (Bullsbrook, West Australia; Veritas, 1984). He appears not to have seen Yallin’s book, but was able to consult letters from twenty-two prelates concerning the death of the Pope, collected in a volume entitled *Lettres de Rome sur le singulier tr‚pas de Jean-Paul I* by a Parisian journalist under the pseudonym Jean Jacques Thierry. The volume was suppressed almost immediately after it was published. The Pope died during the night, his call for help having been inexplicably ignored. In the morning, his corpse was found at 5:30 and by 9:30 embalmers had completed their work, having removed the vital organs that would be needed for an autopsy and reportedly destroyed them! This fact was apparently unknown to the persons who, during the following days, demanded an autopsy that had been made impossible. That indecent precaution establishes the fact of murder.)
Religiously, the Church committed suicide. Every ‘revealed’ religion must profess to be based on transcendental truth that is immutable and eternal, revealed, directly or indirectly, by an eternal, immutable, and infallible god. The Roman Church claimed to have been founded by an Apostle expressly delegated for that purpose by its incarnate god, and Pius XII, the last Pontifex Maximus before the new r‚gime, was the two hundred and sixty-second in an apostolic succession, representing, it was claimed, an unbroken tradition and a doctrine that had been received from the divinely-appointed Apostle.
As every man capable of logical thought saw at once, the radical changes in doctrine made by the new r‚gime necessarily implied that either (a) the Church’s god had ignorantly, irrationally, or maliciously lied to his Vicars on earth for nineteen centuries, or (b) the two hundred and sixty-two Vicars had misrepresented the wishes and commands of their celestial principal.
The drastic changes did not make the Church simply explode, because faith commonly precludes logical thought, and in the Roman Church, the mass of votaries had long been accustomed to believe whatever they were told by their priest and unquestioningly to follow his directions.
When the Church was “modernized,” as though it were an old house or an obsolete railroad, many ostentatious changes in practice may have been partly devised to conceal vital changes in doctrine. Most churches, for example, were stripped of their ornaments and made as bare and uninteresting as churches of the most Puritanical Protestant sects. The Latin mass, which was impressive when well performed, was replaced with vernacular gabble that was tediously flat and boring when it was not ludicrous. Priests were converted into Protestant ministers, delivering commonplace sermons. Some venerated Saints were unceremoniously tossed out onto the scrap heap. But all these changes were relatively superficial.
If one considered the new doctrine critically, one immediately saw what had been the cardinal and most drastic change. The attitude toward the Jews that the Christian god had presumably ordained for nineteen centuries was reversed. The change was neatly illustrated by the Cardinal who is believed most likely to become the next Pope. He boasts that he is a faithful and practicing Jew, and brazenly asserts that Christianity is merely a kind of auxiliary church by which deserving *goyim* are admitted to some of the privileges God irrevocably bestowed on his Chosen People. (4)
(4. See *Liberty Bell*, May 1987, pp. 6-14.)
It was obvious, therefore, that the Roman Catholic Church had been captured by the Jews and would be operated in their interests. Strangely enough, this fact was generally ignored by even the most vehement adversaries of the “modernization.” (5)
(5. Mr. Compton, in the work cited in Note 3 *supra*, attributes the capture of the Church to a conspiracy that included Weishaupt’s Illuminati, Aleister Crowley’s Satanism, and other secret societies, including, of course, Freemasonry, along the lines well known from the writings of Nesta Webster, Christina Stoddard (“Inquire Within”), Lady Queensboro, and many others. He carefully disregards the Jews, but a sheet reproduced from typewriting and of uncertain provenance, enclosed with the copy of his book sent to me, identifies Wojtyia (John Paul II) as a Jew, son of a Kikess named Wanda Katz.)
Since I am certain that Christianity is a fundamental fact that must be taken into account in any worthwhile consideration of our present situation or attempt to foresee our probable future, I have devoted many pages in *Liberty Bell* to that subject, with special attention to the Roman Catholic Church, the largest and most influential of all Christian denominations. Most recently, in “The Stolen Church,” December 1990, I recommended the *The New Montinian Church*, an impressive English translation of an important work by the Reverend D. Joaquin S enz y Arriaga, and in “The Vacant See,” April-May 1991, I reported what were evidently the conclusions of a canon lawyer that the Papacy had been vacant since the death of Pius XII in 1958.
I was pleased when my opinion about the cardinal importance of the Roman Church in our plight today was corroborated from an unexpected source, Mr. Lawrence Patterson’s *Criminal Politics* (P.O. Box 37812, Cincinnati, Ohio ; monthly, $187.50 per annum).
*Criminal Politics* is devoted exclusively to finance and to consideration of the ways in which Americans may conserve what they have saved and still own, in spite of the Federal government. Since in countries like the United States and Soviet Russian economic laws have been nullified by a tyrannical government, it is necessary to consider political forces, and that includes Catholicism. The issue for April contains (pp. 12-17) an article entitled “The New World Order: Catholicism and the Zionist War Against Our Cultural Standards.”
After noting that the Vatican was once a strenuous opponent of the Communists, and now is virtually allied with them in promoting the “New World Order,” Mr. Patterson takes his departure from an astonishingly candid article published in what was then one of the most widely circulated periodicals, *Look*, (6) 25 January 1966. It was written by the magazine’s senior editor, Joseph Roddy, and entitled “How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking.”
(6. The paid circulation of *Look* at that time was over 7,500,000 copies of each issue; the magazine did not suffer from the indiscreet revelation–at least not immediately. In 1968, its circulation had increased by 200,000, but financial difficulties made it cease publication in October 1971, although its circulation had increased to almost 8,000,000 in 1970.)
Mr. Roddy, after noting that the American Jewish Committee and B’nai B’rith put pressure on the Vatican Council to alter Catholic doctrine in their favor, reported that the real author of the Council’s surrender to Judaism was a French Jew named Jules Isaac, who co”perated with a “Fifth Column” (7) of Marrano traitors in the Council, including the slimy Cardinal Bea, but the success of the work of subversion was to be attributed to a “priest spy,” a Jesuit who served on the staff of Bea and shuttled back and forth between the Vatican and the American Jewish Committee in New York.
(7. I do not like to see ‘Fifth Column’ used in this sense, a perversion of its original meaning. When the Spanish army was delivering Spain from Judaeo-Communist terror in 1936, General Franco, on whom the command had devolved, remarked that four columns of his troops were converging on Madrid, in which there was a ‘fifth column’ composed of the decent Spaniards in that territory, who, while impotent against the power of the Communist government, necessarily sympathized with the army that was fighting to free them and would assist its efforts whenever they feasibly could. A ‘fifth column,’ therefore, is not composed of traitors, but of patriots held in subjection by an alien power.)
According to Mr. Roddy, the decree of the Vatican Council drafted by Jules Isaac “would have gone down early,” but for the “covert help” of the “priest-spy.”
That seems implausible. It is hard to see how the “priest-spy” could have had the pivotal r”le attributed to him. When Roncalli, who, under the laws of the Church, was not even a Catholic, slithered onto the See of Rome as John XXIII, his election must have been procured by accomplices in the College of Cardinals, (8) and he almost certainly had *in petto* a scheme for capturing and Judaizing the Church, probably including the Vatican Council that he convened in 1962 and guided through its intermittent sessions to its consummation of the revolutionary take-over in 1965. Mr. Patterson notes that after Roncalli was elected Pope in 1958, the larger newspapers in this country dropped their neutral or mildly hostile attitude toward the Catholic Church and suddenly blossomed with bouquets for “good Pope John.” The Jewish Lords of the American press must have received from their superiors advice that “Roncalli is our boy.”
(8. When the Cardinals meet to elect a new pope and are immured, there is always a period of frantic competition between various aspirants and their supporters, and political trading and retrading of votes until a compromise is reached or, if there is an unresolvable deadlock, an interim pontiff is elected to hold office while the factions regroup. A few wily intriguers, especially if well supplied with cash, can often determine the outcome of an election.)
The capture of the Church had already been planned before the Council got under way, and I cannot imagine how the “priest-spy” could have done more than arrange matters of detail or transport cash when he served as liaison between his Jewish employers in New York and important members of the Council. Only if millions or billions of dollars in real money were needed to consolidate the position of Roncalli and his accomplices, and were supplied from New York, could the messenger who delivered the bribes be said to have determined the decisions of the Council, but Mr. Roddy says nothing about that.
Mr. Roddy did not name the “priest-spy,” who, he said, pretended to be a conservative Catholic but was really “100%” in the Zionist interest and might himself be a Jew disguised as a Jesuit. He provided, however, a series of more or less enigmatic clues to the man’s identity.
Mr. Patterson reports that his research has identified the “priest-spy” as Malachi Martin, alias (by his own admission) Michael Serafian, alias (by implication) F.F. Cartus, and (therefore) alias Timothy Fitzharris-O’Boyle.
Martin’s career corresponds to the clues given by Roddy. He was a Jesuit, had been a professor in the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome (reputed to be a scholar of Semitic languages and an expert on the Dead Sea Scrolls), had migrated to New York, written for the Jewish periodical, *Commentary*, under an alias, a book, *The Pilgrim*, under another alias, and under his own name many articles as a “conservative Catholic” for Buckley’s *National Review*, of which he was, for a time, the Religious Editor. Although neither Roddy nor Mr. Patterson mentions the even more significant fact, Malachi Martin claims to have been an intimate friend and advisor of Roncalli.
According to various reports, Martin, after he established himself in this country, left the priesthood and married. He has certainly produced under his own name an amazing number of presumably highly profitable books, all aimed at Catholics who have not abandoned the traditional faith of the Church. Whether he continues to write under pseudonyms, I do not know.
Now if Martin did indeed play an important r”le in betraying the Church into the hands of its inveterate enemies, he certainly knew what he was doing. Piers Compton quotes him as having predicted, at the time the Vatican Council completed its work of subversion in December 1965, “Well before the year 2000, there will no longer be a religious institute recognizable as the Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church of today…. There will be no centralized control, no uniformity in teaching, no universality in practice or worship, prayer, sacrifice, and priesthood.”
He believed that his prophecy was being fulfilled. In his *The Jesuits, the Society of Jesus, and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church* (New York, Simon & Schuster, 1987), he wrote:
‘The extent of the damage produced in the Church….after 1965 can be gauged a mere twenty years later. Pope John Paul II now presides over a Church organization that is in shambles, a rebellious and decadent clergy, an ignorant and recalcitrant body of bishops, and a confused and divided assembly of believers. The Roman Catholic Church, which used to present itself as the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, appears now as a pluralistic, permissive, ecumenical, and evolutionary ecclesial group.’ (9)
(9. In this book, he, a former Jesuit, accuses the Jesuits of having become a gang of conspiratorial Marxists engaged in promoting, under the guise of religion, a Communist dictatorship. He even avers that the Jesuits in the United States drew up detailed plans for the installation of “Maoist Marxism” in this country.)
In all writings published under his own name, so far as I know, Malachi Martin has consistently taken the position of a Catholic faithful to the Church’s doctrine and traditions, estimating that about 40% of the present College of Cardinals are Christians, ridiculing American bishops who jabbered about “ending poverty” and “sharing the wealth” by pointing out that the Roman Church is the wealthiest body in the world, with assets totaling hundreds of billions of dollars and possibly amounting to two *trillion* dollars ($2,000,000,000,000), and insisting that “Christ never singled out the proletariat with a preferential opinion in their favor.” The mission of the Church is exclusively spiritual and it has no competence or authority to pronounce on matters of economics or politics. (10)
(10. For example, in an article in *National Review*, 5 January 1979, which I have consulted in my files of that publication, he wrote: “Over the last fifteen years, the Roman Catholic Church in the United States, under the leadership and authority of its bishops, has become mainly two things. It is, first and most stridently, a jumbled shop-front jammed with a motley array of political issues, civil squabbles, sociological experiments, and psychological theories. _ Second, and more poignantly, it is a gristmill grinding down the hope and enthusiasm of faithful followers who know that their bishops have neglected the purity of their faith and the practice of religion in their Church, in favor of such issues as environmental pollution, ethnic rights, land distribution, the Panama Canal, Rhodesian chrome, and the evils of U.S. Capitalism.” In the remainder of the article, he does not explicitly identify all these activities as serving Communist ends, but rather conspicuously avoids considerations that would *lƒcher le mot*.)
I have not seen his latest book, *Keys of the Blood* (New York, Simon & Schuster, 1990), which was reviewed by Paul A. Fisher in *Christian News*, 3 June 1991, and criticized by Mr. Patterson in the article I have cited. In this book, Martin, somewhat at variance with his earlier pronouncements, tells his readers that the world is now the prize which each of three reciprocally hostile organizations are tying to gain for itself, viz.:
‘(a) A disintegrating Soviet Empire led by Mikhail Gorbachev; (b) transnationalists and internationalists (a generic characterization for international bankers and businesses affiliated with the Council on Foreign Affairs (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission (TLC), and (c) a deteriorating Roman Catholic Church, the principal institution of Christendom, led by Pope Paul II.’ (11)
(11. I quote from Mr. Fisher’s review. Note that there is no mention of Jews, which would not have been tactful in a book published by Jews; but did the glaring omission have another motive? I gather from Mr. Fisher that Martin expects a “direct intervention of God” during the lifetime of the present Pope!)
That statement is the principal basis for Mr. Patterson’s denunciation of Martin as a “fake conservative” and “double agent” of the Zionists, and he marshals abundant proofs that Wojtyia (John Paul II) is co”perating so closely with both Soviets, the “Trilateralists” and the Zionists in foisting the “New World Order” on the civilized nations to reduce them to barbaric slavery that the Pope must be considered a servant or accomplice of all of the three aspects of what must be a single force bent on our enslavement and eventual extinction. He reasons that Martin’s book must be intended to confuse traditional Catholics and other readers by deceiving them about our enemies and creating the deceptive illusion that three tentacles of the octopus are fighting each other.
I am not here concerned with establishing Martin’s guilt or innocence, and I certainly shall not waste time in collecting and analysing the many books and articles published under his own name or in ascertaining whether or not the continues to publish divergent works under pseudonyms, but I shall point out that, so far as I can tell from the reviews, he is guilty of a certain duplicity in concealing in his latest book conclusions that he has stated elsewhere.
In an address reported by the *Rocky Mountain News*, 8 October 1982 (reproduced photographically in *Christian News* he stated explicitly that “The Christian church is decaying, has nothing to say, and is on the way out.” He added that the other great religions of the world, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, Shintoism, “are headed in the same direction as Christianity and even faster.” He predicted the imposition of “a worldwide religion with one structure and institutions,” managed by “one great bureaucracy. And out of it will emerge the ultimate disaster.”
What is crucially significant in that speech is that he explicitly affirmed that the Jews’ religion (the basis of their racial unity) is not in the least subject to change or decay and will always endure triumphantly. “It is irradicable, (12) indestructible,” he affirmed, “there is no decay and *nothing can destroy the soul of Judaism.* (My italics.)
(12. He means *uneradicable*.)
There you have it. There, stated with blinding clarity for all who think while reading, is an indication of who will own and enslave the world of tomorrow. No author, unwilling to bring upon himself the terrorists of the Jews’ government in Washington, could have stated the fact more explicitly.
According to Mr. Lawrence, Martin, in his new book, certainly concealing or reversing his belief in an “ultimate disaster,” not only regards the New World Order as inevitable, but lauds it a “Grand Design of God.” And he says, “As to the time factor involved, those of us who are under 70 will see at least the basic structure of the new world government installed…. Those of us who are under 40 will surely live under its legislative, executive, and judicial authority and control.”
And he could have added that Americans who are now under five will surely grow up to be imbecile creatures, so well trained that whenever they see or smell a Sheeny, they will automatically drop to their knees and knock their foreheads three times on the pavement in veneration of their living gods.
Jews Gave Jerry Falwell a Lear jet for his services on their behalf
In 1977 the Likud party under Menachem Begin came to power on an expansionist Zionist platform using biblical phraseology to justify the settlement of the West Bank. It was Begin for example who first renamed Israel and the Occupied Territories as Judaea and Samaria. In America the Jewish lobby realised the potential significance of wooing the political endorsement of the powerful 50-60 million Evangelical block vote through their fundamentalist leadership. With this in mind, in 1979, the Israeli government honoured Jerry Falwell with the Jabotinsky Award in appreciation of his support of Israel. They also provided him with a Lear jet to assist in his work on their behalf.
Archived for Educational Purposes only Under U.S.C. Title 17 Section 107 by Jew Watch Library at www.jewwatch.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in the Jew Watch Library is archived here under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only. Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml